Media and Publication

Partner, G.R. Bhatia shared his views with BQ Prime regarding CCI’s draft settlement rules in an article tilted – CCI’s Draft Settlement Rules ‘Critical First Step’ But More Clarity Needed.’

Partner, Sanjeev Kumar was quoted in ‘The Hindu Businessline’ in an article titled -‘𝑬𝒂𝒔𝒆𝒐𝒇𝑳𝒊𝒗𝒊𝒏𝒈:𝑴𝑪𝑨𝒓𝒐𝒍𝒍𝒔𝒐𝒖𝒕𝒂𝒎𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒚𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒈𝒓𝒂𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒇𝒐𝒓𝑳𝑳𝑷𝒔.’

Luthra and Luthra Law Offices India – Partner, Rubal Bansal Maini shared her insightful views with Business Standard in an article about advance tax titled – ‘𝑫𝒆𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒕𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝒕𝒐 𝑫𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒍𝒊𝒏𝒆: 𝑾𝒉𝒂𝒕 𝒕𝒐 𝒌𝒏𝒐𝒘 𝒂𝒃𝒐𝒖𝒕 𝑨𝒅𝒗𝒂𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝑻𝒂𝒙 𝑷𝒂𝒚𝒎𝒆𝒏𝒕.’

Partner Designate, Amit Panigrahi was quoted in ‘mint’ in an article titled ‘When Christian Louboutin cited ChatGPT in a Delhi Court’ which talks about Designer – Christian Louboutin moving to court against an Indian shoemaker; accusing them for making shoes patented by the French Designer.

Partner, Wasim Beg has been quoted in the Business Standard in an article titled ‘Fair Share: Children Born Of Invalid Marriages Are Treated As Legitimate’ as the Court judgments have said they are entitled to rights in both self-acquired and ancestral properties of parents.

Partner, Vikash Kukreti shared his views about litigation matters in the Telecom sector and has been quoted in ‘MINT’ in an article titled – ‘Telcos look to free capital by settling Rs 76,780 crore litigation’

Partner, Nishant Singh shared his view with Business Standard regarding norms for investment in holding companies in an article titled ‘Sebi proposal to have separate delisting framework puts shine on holdcos’

Partner, Wasim Beg shared his views on Moneycontrol regarding the Jan Vishwas bill which was passed in the Lok Sabha last week.

Partner, Harish Kumar shared his expert views with BQ Prime regarding Sebi’s rule on promoter disclosures. Listed companies must now disclose all agreements made by promoters, directors with a company or third parties if they have a significant impact on the control or management.

Partner G.R. Bhatia shared his views with ‘Livemint’ as the court ruled that in the issues pertaining to rights of patentees, the Patents Act overrides the Competition Act and hence the anti-trust regulator cannot probe issues pertaining to rights of patentees.